Prove of Harm: Patient Experiences and Medical Standards in Court Decisions

  • Ekaterina Borozdina European University at Saint Petersburg
  • Egor Elnitckii European University at Saint Petersburg
  • Daria Khodorenko European University at Saint Petersburg
Keywords: patient-centered medicine, evidence-based medicine, court decisions, healthcare, moral harm, informal rules

Abstract

The standardization of medical work and the transition to patient-­centred care are the main trends that characterize modern healthcare systems. Some studies suggest that patient-­centred care is a component of evidence-­based medicine, while others argue that these principles contradict each other. We studied the framework of the relationship between patient-­centeredness and medical standardization set by Russian judicial practice: how the nuances of the patient’s experience and adherence to the evidence-­based medicine paradigm are interpreted in court proceedings, and what pragmatic consequences these interpretations have. In the article, we examined the normative ideas of medical practice and the position of the patient in the healthcare system, which can be acquired from the texts of court decisions. A unique representative database was created from the texts of 498 first instance court decisions on civil claims of patients against medical organizations, published in 2018. The study was carried out in the mixed methods strategy. To explore how standards of evidence-­based medicine and attention to patient experience are interpreted and used in court decisions, we analysed the texts of 52 randomly selected documents. With the help of regression analysis of data from 498 decisions, it was found out what practical consequences the interpretations presented in the texts have. As a result, we showed statistically significant relationships between variables that quantify the circumstances of the conflict between medical professionals and patients (the fact of the death of the victim, children among the victims, the number of doctors working with the victims), the amounts requested by the plaintiffs and the court decision on the amount of compensation. With the help of a qualitative analysis, it is described how the documents interpret (non-)compliance with medical standards and prove the significance of the harm caused to the victims.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ekaterina Borozdina, European University at Saint Petersburg

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), assistant professor, European University at St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation. Email: eborozdina@eu.spb.ru

Egor Elnitckii, European University at Saint Petersburg

PhD student, European University at St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation. Email: eelnitsky@eu.spb.ru

Daria Khodorenko, European University at Saint Petersburg

Assistant, European University at St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation. Email: dkhodorenko@eu.spb.ru

Published
2022-07-28
How to Cite
BorozdinaE., ElnitckiiE., & KhodorenkoD. (2022). Prove of Harm: Patient Experiences and Medical Standards in Court Decisions. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 20(2), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-2-199-214