Virtuous Victimization and the Boundaries of Third Sector Ethics

  • Aleksander Maksimenko HSE University
  • Dina Krylova HSE University
  • Olga Deyneka St. Petersburg State University
  • Anna Bushueva Kostroma State University
Keywords: virtuous victimhood, ethical behavior, NGOs, dark triad, charitable foundations, disproportionate exchange, signaling of virtue, signaling of victimhood, social justice

Abstract

This article analyzes the phenomenon of virtuous victimhood in the context of crowdfunding, a method of attracting private donations in situations of institutional instability and a lack of regulatory frameworks within the third sector. Relying on the concept of the 'double signal' (Ok et al., 2020), the authors argue that demonstrating vulnerability alongside moral impeccability increases the legitimacy of seeking help and the likelihood of receiving resources. The study combines psychological and institutional perspectives, including an analysis of how nonprofit organisation representatives perceive themselves and how potential donors perceive the moral image of the victim. The empirical part of the study consists of two stages. In the first stage, a virtuous victimhood questionnaire adapted for a Russian sample (n = 101) was used. The results showed that employees of charitable organizations exhibited signs of symbolic victimhood, such as uncertainty about the future, a sense of being undervalued, and social invisibility, especially among respondents with longer professional experience. In the second stage (n = 409), the study employed an experimental design in which the degree of moral 'deservingness' of the character requesting a donation was manipulated. The results revealed that the greater the perceived virtue of the victim, the more willing were the respondents to provide financial support, and the larger the expected donation amount. The obtained data make it possible to interpret virtuous victimhood as a socially significant strategy of public engagement in the field of charity. The risks of its pragmatic use are discussed, as well as the need for institutional reinforcement of standards of transparency, accountability, and ethical responsibility. This article contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary research agenda focusing on the moral foundations of social support, trust, and legitimacy at a time when representative institutions are in crisis and aid distribution mechanisms are undergoing transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Aleksander Maksimenko, HSE University

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Chief Researcher, Laboratory of Anti-­Corruption Policy, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation. Email: maximenko.al@gmail.com ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0003–0891–4950

Dina Krylova, HSE University

Head, Laboratory of Anti-­Corruption Policy, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation. Email: krylovadv@hse.ru ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0001–5069–0319

Olga Deyneka, St. Petersburg State University

Dr. Sci. (Psychol.), Professor, Head of the Department of Political Psychology, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation. Email: osdeyneka@yandex.ru ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000–0001–8224–2190

Anna Bushueva, Kostroma State University

PhD candidate at the Department of General and Social Psychology, Kostroma State University, Kostroma, Russian Federation. Email: a. m.bushueva@yandex.ru ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009–0007–2492–5568

Published
2025-10-16
How to Cite
MaksimenkoA., KrylovaD., DeynekaO., & BushuevaA. (2025). Virtuous Victimization and the Boundaries of Third Sector Ethics. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 23(2), 267-288. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2025-23-2-267-288
Section
ARTICLES IN RUSSIAN