Probation as a Mechanism of Selective Social Integration: The Case of the Altai Territory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2026-24-2-313-330Keywords:
probation, social integration, resocialization, agency, social inequalityAbstract
This article examines probation as a means of facilitating the social reintegration of individuals released from correctional institutions. It aims to explore how participants in the probation program perceive opportunities for social integration, supervisory control and differences in access to resources for reintegration into society. The theoretical framework is based on the concept of agency, enabling probation to be viewed as an environment where support and control interact. The empirical material consists of semi-structured interviews with nineteen participants from a correctional center located within an industrial enterprise in the Altai Krai region of Russia. The data were analyzed using thematic coding. The findings show that supervisory control remains a significant aspect of probationers’ daily lives and significantly influences their perceptions of probation. At the same time, probation also creates opportunities for social integration through employment, the acquisition of new professional skills, the expansion of social ties, and participation in collective forms of interaction. Employment emerges as the most significant integration resource, enabling participants to develop new social roles and mitigate the consequences of long-term isolation. However, the effects of probation are distributed unevenly. More active participants gain additional opportunities for social integration, are more often perceived as trustworthy, and have greater access to certain support resources. Consequently, new distinctions emerge between different groups of probation participants within the probation system itself. The study concludes that probation can be understood as a selective mechanism of social integration that simultaneously reduces social exclusion and reproduces new forms of inequality. These findings improve our understanding of the social effects of probation and could inform social policy measures aimed at supporting different groups of individuals undergoing social reintegration.









